<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Synapse72.com &#187; Women&#8217;s Health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synapse72.com/category/health/womens-health/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synapse72.com</link>
	<description>News, Articles, Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:48:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Diagnostic Breast Cancer with Mammograms and MRI</title>
		<link>http://www.synapse72.com/diagnostic-breast-cancer-with-mammograms-and-mri.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapse72.com/diagnostic-breast-cancer-with-mammograms-and-mri.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synapse72</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammograms interpret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[using MRI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapse72.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian radiologist presents findings to the Radiological Society of North America
&#8220;The radiologist wants a follow-up mammogram in six months,&#8221; your doctor tells you.
You&#8217;ve heard and seen all the TV and Radio ads about 1 in 8 women getting breast cancer. So, you&#8217;ve been good&#8211;you got screened. Now you have to do it all over again?
As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian radiologist presents findings to the Radiological Society of North America</p>
<p>&#8220;The radiologist wants a follow-up mammogram in six months,&#8221; your doctor tells you.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve heard and seen all the TV and Radio ads about 1 in 8 women getting breast cancer. So, you&#8217;ve been good&#8211;you got screened. Now you have to do it all over again?<span id="more-51"></span></p>
<p>As it turns out, the mammogram is difficult to interpret due to &#8220;dense glandular tissue,&#8221; a very common finding in younger women or those on HRT.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s when you realize that not knowing whether you have a tumor or not is one of the most trying experiences of your life.</p>
<p><a title="Cancer Medication" href="http://www.drugsboat.com/cancer_medication_rx31.html">You don&#8217;t have a tumor, but you know lots of women get breast cancer</a>. You&#8217;re scared but as far as anyone can tell there really is nothing wrong with you, so why talk to anyone about it? It&#8217;s enough to make you a nervous wreck.</p>
<p>Your doctor reassures you, quoting statistics about screening and telling you that &#8220;this is just a standard practice&#8211;there is no indication of tumor.&#8221; But somehow the prospect of bad news lingers in the back of your mind.</p>
<p>Doctors know that repeated mammography may pose a risk of cumulative radiation exposure, yet the risks of missing a tumor far outweigh this. But now there is a way to reduce the number of mammograms some women receive due to dense glandular tissue.</p>
<p>And a more definitive answer to &#8220;that question&#8221; may make quite a few patients feel much better.</p>
<p>Why is &#8220;dense glandular tissue&#8221; a problem? Conventional x-rays (a mammogram is a low-radation x-ray) are not the best way to view soft tissue changes. It is ironic that x-rays are used to diagnose breast cancer because a small tumor inside dense glandular tissue cannot be seen.</p>
<p>This is why you may see radiologists constantly and tediously poring over mammograms with magnifying glasses. They do their best not to miss anything.</p>
<p>If there is a finding of &#8220;dense glandular tissue&#8221; and the radiologist cannot rule out a tumor (she can&#8217;t rule out what she can&#8217;t see) the best course in the past has been to follow the patient with a repeat mammogram in 6 months, usually, or sometimes 12 months so the radiologist can compare the series of mammograms to see if there any changes.</p>
<p>A recent study of 196 women shows that MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) can be used to rule out suspicious-looking mammograms. The benefit to the patient is that she doesn&#8217;t have to worry for 6 months, waiting for her &#8220;follow-up.&#8221;</p>
<p><a title="herbaldrugstore.org" href="http://www.herbaldrugstore.org/quickbust.php">One of the big pay-offs of using MRI is that there is no radiation used in the procedure. MRI uses radio-frequency magnetic pulses that have not yet been demonstrated to have any ill effects</a>. In addition, MRI is considered much better than other radiographic procedures in imaging soft tissue such as fat, glands, muscle and ligaments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapse72.com/diagnostic-breast-cancer-with-mammograms-and-mri.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
